
doi: 10.1002/bip.21579
pmid: 21207457
AbstractThe technologies associated with DNA sequencing are rapidly evolving. Indeed, single‐molecule DNA sequencing strategies are cheaper and faster than ever before. Despite this progress, every sequencing platform to date relies on reading the genome in small, abstract fragments, typically of less than 1000 bases in length. The overarching aim of the optical map is to complement the information derived from DNA sequencing by providing long‐range context on which these short sequence reads can be built. This is typically done using an enzyme to target and modify at short DNA sequences of, say, six bases in length throughout the genome. By accurately placing these short pieces of sequence on long genomic DNA fragments, up to several millions of bases in length, a scaffold for sequence assembly can be obtained. This review focuses on three enzymatic approaches to optical mapping. Optical mapping was first developed using restriction enzymes to sequence‐specifically cleave DNA that is immobilized on a surface. More recently, nicking enzymes have found application in the sequence‐specific fluorescent labeling of DNA for optical mapping. Such covalent modification allows the DNA to be imaged in solution, and this, in combination with developing nanofluidic technologies, is enabling new high‐throughput approaches to mapping. And, finally, this review will discuss the recent development of mapping with subdiffraction‐limit precision using methyltransferase enzymes to label the DNA with an ultrahigh density. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 95: 298–311, 2011.
Base Sequence, Optical Phenomena, Chromosome Mapping, Nanotechnology, DNA, DNA Restriction Enzymes, Genomics, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Fluorescent Dyes
Base Sequence, Optical Phenomena, Chromosome Mapping, Nanotechnology, DNA, DNA Restriction Enzymes, Genomics, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Fluorescent Dyes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 92 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
