
doi: 10.1002/bip.21332
pmid: 20091872
AbstractPeptide self‐assembly can be used as a bottom–up approach to material fabrication. Although many different types of materials can be prepared from peptides, hydrogels are perhaps one of the most common. Gels typically result from the self‐assembly of peptides into fibrillar networks. Controlling the structural morphology of these fibrils and the networks they form allows direct control over a given material's bulk properties. However, exerting this control is extremely difficult as the mechanistic rules that govern peptide self‐assembly are far from being established. Conversely, several amyloidogenic proteins have been shown to self‐assemble into fibrils using a mechanism known as domain swapping. Here, discrete units of secondary structure or even whole domains are exchanged (swapped) among discrete proteins during self‐assembly to form extended networks with precise structural control. This review discusses several common mechanistic variations of domain swapping using naturally occurring proteins as examples. The possibility of using these principles to design peptides capable of controlled assembly and fibril formation leading to materials with targeted properties is explored. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 94: 141–155, 2010.This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com
Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Molecular Sequence Data, Proteins, Hydrogels, Amino Acid Sequence, Peptides, Protein Engineering
Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Molecular Sequence Data, Proteins, Hydrogels, Amino Acid Sequence, Peptides, Protein Engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
