
pmid: 19946880
AbstractCompatible solutes constitute a diverse class of low‐molecular‐mass organic molecules that are accumulated in high intracellular concentrations in response to the external stress of hyperosmolality or high temperature. Many of these compounds like α, α‐trehalose are well known for their stabilizing effect on protein structure and could lead to development of more stable protein formulations. Negatively charged solutes like mannosylglycerate (R‐2‐O‐α‐D‐mannopyranosyl‐glycerate) are widespread among (hyper)thermophilic microorganisms and are thought to be exceptionally potent stabilizers of proteins under high‐temperature denaturation conditions. To further inquire into the role of compound charge for protective function, we have compared two naturally occurring and structurally related solutes, glucosylglycerol (2‐O‐α‐D‐glucopyranosyl‐sn‐glycerol) and glucosylglycerate (R‐2‐O‐α‐D‐glucopyranosyl‐glycerate), as stabilizers of different enzymes undergoing inactivation through elevated temperature or freeze drying, and benchmarked their effects against that of α,α‐trehalose. Glucosylglycerate in concentrations of ≥0.1 M was the most effective in preventing thermally induced loss of enzyme activity of lactate dehydrogenase, mannitol dehydrogenase, starch phosphorylase, and xylose reductase. α,α‐Trehalose could usually be replaced by glucosylglycerol without compromising enzyme stability. Glucosylglycerol and glucosylglycerate afforded substantial (eightfold) protection to mannitol dehydrogenase during freeze drying.
Fungal Proteins, Freeze Drying, Bacterial Proteins, Glucosides, Enzyme Stability, Temperature, Glyceric Acids, Enzymes
Fungal Proteins, Freeze Drying, Bacterial Proteins, Glucosides, Enzyme Stability, Temperature, Glyceric Acids, Enzymes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 68 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
