
AbstractNetworks in nature possess a remarkable amount of structure. Via a series of data‐driven discoveries, the cutting edge of network science has recently progressed from positing that the random graphs of mathematical graph theory might accurately describe real networks to the current viewpoint that networks in nature are highly complex and structured entities. The identification of high order structures in networks unveils insights into their functional organization. Recently, Clauset, Moore, and Newman,1 introduced a new algorithm that identifies such heterogeneities in complex networks by utilizing the hierarchy that necessarily organizes the many levels of structure. Here, we anchor their algorithm in a general community detection framework and discuss the future of community detection. BioEssays 30:934–938, 2008. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Physics - Physics and Society, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), FOS: Physical sciences, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods, Models, Biological, Physics - Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability, FOS: Biological sciences, Computer Simulation, Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics, Algorithms, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an), Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
Physics - Physics and Society, Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech), FOS: Physical sciences, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods, Models, Biological, Physics - Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability, FOS: Biological sciences, Computer Simulation, Condensed Matter - Statistical Mechanics, Algorithms, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an), Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 87 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
