
doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1105
pmid: 29377643
BackgroundMany different causes of malformations have been established. The surveillance of a consecutive population of births, including stillbirths and elective terminations of pregnancy because of fetal anomalies, can identify each infant with malformations and determine the frequency of the apparent etiologies. This report is a sequel to the first such analysis in the first 10 years of this Active Malformations Surveillance Program (Nelson and Holmes, ).MethodsThe presence of malformations was determined among 289,365 births over 41 years (1972–2012) at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. The abnormalities were identified from the review of the examination findings of the pediatricians and consultants and diagnostic testing for the live‐born infants and the autopsies of the fetuses in elective terminations and stillbirths.ResultsA total of 7020 (2.4%) infants and fetuses with one or more malformations were identified with these apparent etiologies in 26.6%: Mendelian disorders, including infants with postaxial polydactyly, type B; chromosome abnormalities; vascular disruption; complications of monozygous twinning; and environmental factors. The malformations of unknown etiology were a much larger group.ConclusionWhile several causes of malformations have been identified, many remain unexplained. Combining the ascertainment in a future surveillance programs with genome sequencing and chromosome microarray analysis will increase significantly the number of malformations attributed to genetic mechanisms. Birth Defects Research 110:87–91, 2018.© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Chromosome Aberrations, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, Congenital Abnormalities, Fetal Development, Fetus, Maternal Exposure, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female, Boston
Chromosome Aberrations, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, Congenital Abnormalities, Fetal Development, Fetus, Maternal Exposure, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female, Boston
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 58 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
