
doi: 10.1002/bab.1012
pmid: 23586828
AbstractThe importance of B‐lymphocyte‐restricted differentiation antigen Bp35 (CD20) as a target for immunotherapeutic depletion of B cells is irrefutable. Several anti‐human CD20 (anti‐hCD20) monoclonal antibodies are expressed at different stages of development. However, resistance to anti‐CD20 therapy has made the search for new alternatives imperative. Identification of B‐cell epitopes within hCD20 using in silico tools can provide new opportunities to develop monoclonal antibodies with different binding sites. Furthermore, identification of the relationship between amino acid sequences of predicted B‐cell epitopes and immune responses facilitates the determination of immunogenic regions of proteins by using their primary structure. Experimental evaluation of predicted linear B‐cell epitopes as candidate peptides and bioinformatics allows us to explore this relationship. In this study, we selected three candidate epitopes within the extra membrane loop of hCD20 with the aid of five immunoinformatics predictor web servers and evaluated mouse humoral response to keyhole‐limpet‐hemocyanin‐conjugated peptides, and P4 and P5 peptides (the extracellular loop of hCD20 without and with a disulfide bond, respectively). Injection of the peptides yielded results that confirmed the prediction and selection of candidates. ELISA and flow cytometry corroborated the in silico selections. The B‐cell epitopes P1, P2, and P3 were effective for immunization of mice.
Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Antigens, CD20, Flow Cytometry, Cell Line, Mice, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Animals, Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte, Humans, Computer Simulation
Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Antigens, CD20, Flow Cytometry, Cell Line, Mice, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Animals, Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte, Humans, Computer Simulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
