
doi: 10.1002/asmb.2478
handle: 11383/2170148 , 11383/2170072 , 11571/1316608
AbstractBitcoins are traded on various exchange platforms and, therefore, prices may differ across trading venues. We aim to investigate return connectedness across eight of the major exchanges of Bitcoin, both from a static and a dynamic viewpoint. To this end, we employ an extension of the order‐invariant forecast error variance decomposition proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) to a generalized vector error correction framework. Our results suggest that there is strong connectedness among the exchanges, as expected, although some of them behave dissimilarly. We identify Bitfinex and Coinbase as leading exchanges during the considered period, while Kraken as a follower exchange. We also obtain that connectedness across exchanges is strongly dynamic, as it evolves over time.
market linkage, spillover, 330, Statistics, bitcoin, forecast error variance decomposition, market linkages, market risk, Bitcoin; forecast error variance decomposition; market linkages; market risk; spillovers; vector autoregression; vector error correction, vector autoregression, vector error correction, spillovers, Bitcoin
market linkage, spillover, 330, Statistics, bitcoin, forecast error variance decomposition, market linkages, market risk, Bitcoin; forecast error variance decomposition; market linkages; market risk; spillovers; vector autoregression; vector error correction, vector autoregression, vector error correction, spillovers, Bitcoin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
