
AbstractConsider an m‐machine flow shop with n jobs. The processing time of job j, j = 1,…, n, on each one of the m machines is equal to the random variable Xj and is distributed according to Fj. We show that, under certain conditions, more homogeneous distributions F1,…, Fn result in a smaller expected makespan. We also study the effect of the variability of distribution Fj on the expected waiting costs of the n jobs and on the job sequencing which minimizes this total expected waiting cost. We show that the smallest (largest) variance first rule minimizes the total expected waiting cost on a single machine when the waiting cost function is increasing convex (concave). We also show that the smallest variance first rule minimizes, under given conditions, the total expected waiting cost in an m machine flow shop when the waiting cost function is increasing convex. Similar results are also obtained for the two‐machine job shop. Similar results cannot be obtained when the processing times of job j on the various machines are i.i.d. and distributed according to Fj.
two-machine job shop, Deterministic scheduling theory in operations research, stochastic scheduling, m- machine flow shop, majorization, expected waiting costs, makespan, variability ordering, smallest variance first rule, optimal job sequences
two-machine job shop, Deterministic scheduling theory in operations research, stochastic scheduling, m- machine flow shop, majorization, expected waiting costs, makespan, variability ordering, smallest variance first rule, optimal job sequences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
