
doi: 10.1002/asl.170
handle: 11382/524692
AbstractProbabilistic forecasts designed to estimate the probability density function of forecast states are potentially more valuable than single forecasts because (1) they can predict not only the most likely outcome but also the probability of occurrence of extreme and rare events and (2) probabilistic forecasts issued on consecutive days are usually more consistent than corresponding single forecasts. In this communication, the potential economic value of probabilistic and single forecasts are compared, and single and probabilistic forecasts of precipitation for a flooding event are analyzed to illustrate the potential value of consistency between successive forecasts. Copyright © 2008 Royal Meteorological Society
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 104 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
