
doi: 10.1002/asjc.1865
AbstractThis paper explores a linear state estimation problem in non‐Gaussian setting and suggests a computationally simple estimator based on the maximum correntropy criterion Kalman filter (MCC‐KF). The first MCC‐KF method was developed in Joseph stabilized form. It requires two n × n and one m × m matrix inversions, where n is a dimension of unknown dynamic state to be estimated, and m is a dimension of available measurement vector. Therefore, the estimator becomes impractical when the system dimensions increase. Our previous work has suggested an improved MCC‐KF estimator (IMCC‐KF) and its factored‐from (square‐root) implementations that enhance the MCC‐KF estimation quality and numerical robustness against roundoff errors. However, the proposed IMCC‐KF and its square‐root implementations still require the m × m matrix inversion in each iteration step of the filter. For numerical stability and computational complexity reasons it is preferable to avoid the matrix inversion operation. In this paper, we suggest a new IMCC‐KF algorithm that is more accurate and computationally cheaper than the original MCC‐KF and previously suggested IMCC‐KF. Furthermore, compared with stable square‐root algorithms, the new method is also accurate, but less computationally expensive. The results of numerical experiments substantiate the mentioned properties of the new estimator on numerical examples.
Sequential estimation, Kalman filter, maximum correntropy criterion, robust estimation, Filtering in stochastic control theory, Signal detection and filtering (aspects of stochastic processes), sequential processing
Sequential estimation, Kalman filter, maximum correntropy criterion, robust estimation, Filtering in stochastic control theory, Signal detection and filtering (aspects of stochastic processes), sequential processing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
