Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Aquatic Conservation...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Endangered rivers: A case history of the Arkansas River in the Central Plains

Authors: Leonard C. Ferrington;

Endangered rivers: A case history of the Arkansas River in the Central Plains

Abstract

1. This paper presents a summary of recent patterns of surface discharge in the Arkansas River in Kansas, and discusses the implications of dewatering on aquatic insect communities. 2. Significant reductions in surface flows of the Arkansas River have been observed since approximately 1974 in central and western Kansas. Dewatering of the river has been most severe between Syracuse and Great Bend, a distance in excess of 335 river kilometres, and has resulted in complete losses of surface flow for periods in excess of one year at several points along the river. 3. Minimum desirable stream flow (MDSF) standards developed and legislated by the state in the early 1980s have had little effect on reversing the trends associated with river dewatering. It must be concluded that dewatering has had substantial effects on aquatic insect communities through habitat modification in areas where surface flows are dramatically curtailed. These communities are extirpated, or nearly so, in areas where dewatering is most pronounced. 4. Reduction in groundwater withdrawals from the riverine aquifer and palaeochannels, some of which are considerable distances from the present-day river channel, must be considered in order to achieve MDSF during periods of dewatering. 5. Although it may be possible to achieve MDSF, it is argued that MDSF will not be sufficient to allow for development of habitats that are critical for restoration of ‘natural’ communities. A distinction is made between the ideal and the achievable as goals for a management strategy to conserve habitats for aquatic insects, and it is concluded that the ideal of managing surface flows to restore natural communities cannot be achieved in the light of recent reductions of surface flow and conflicting uses of groundwater for irrigation and minicipal consumption. As an alternative, conceited efforts must be made to ensure that MDSF is continuously achieved.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!