Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Alzheimer s & Dement...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI): a novel, disease‐specific, patient‐reported outcome measure for use in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials and patient monitoring

Authors: Engebrecht, Charlotte;

The Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI): a novel, disease‐specific, patient‐reported outcome measure for use in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials and patient monitoring

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTo bolster clinical trial infrastructure, there is a need to develop novel, valid, and reliable patient‐reported outcome (PRO) measures capable of tracking clinically‐relevant changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia over time. This research describes the development and validation of the Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI) as a tool to measure how patients feel and function in response to therapeutic intervention.MethodWe previously conducted semi‐structured qualitative interviews and a national cross‐sectional study with individuals with AD, MCI and dementia to ascertain the most prevalent and impactful symptoms identified by the participants. This data was used to generate the first version of the AD‐HI. We then conducted beta testing of the AD‐HI with individuals with AD and MCI to determine the instrument’s comprehensibility, ease of use, and applicability to the AD and MCI populations. Following participant feedback, we further modified the instrument and conducted test‐retest reliability, known groups validity (Figure 1), area under the curve (AUC) analysis (Figure 2), and factor analysis to validate the AD‐HI.ResultFifteen individuals with AD and MCI participated in the qualitative interviews and 104 individuals participated in the cross‐sectional study. We conducted beta testing with an additional 15 individuals with AD and MCI who stated that the AD‐HI was easy to use, clear, and highly relevant. Twenty‐three individuals with AD, MCI and dementia participated in test‐retest analysis. Known groups analysis demonstrated that the AD‐HI was able to differentiate between subgroups with varying levels of disease burden (based on employment status, disability status and those experiencing seizures).ConclusionThe AD‐HI is a valid and reliable regulatory‐grade instrument capable of measuring multifaceted disease burden in AD, MCI and dementia. The development, optimization and validation of the AD‐HI provides researchers and clinicians with a disease‐specific PRO for use in therapeutic trials and to potentially support FDA drug‐labeling claims.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Drug Development

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities