
ABSTRACT Nonhuman primates constitute an ideal model to study the evolutionary origins of human language, because of their close phylogenetic distance to humans and their reliance on complex communication systems that include different signal types. In this study, we investigated the vocal repertoire of Macaca maura (moor macaques), a highly tolerant primate species endemic to Sulawesi, Indonesia. We conducted detailed acoustic analyses on 1116 high‐quality vocalizations recorded from a well‐habituated wild group of 42 individuals. Using discriminant function and random forest analyses, we found that moor macaques show a graded vocal repertoire, with considerable acoustic overlap between several call types and a high number of acoustic parameters needed for accurate classification. These findings were supported by the failure of unsupervised clustering to detect robust categorical structures beyond a two‐cluster solution. Our findings provide novel insights into the vocal behavior of a yet understudied species, and provide preliminary evidence that moor macaques show graded communication systems.
random forest analysis, Moor macaques, communication, macaque, C800 - Psychology, vocal repertoire
random forest analysis, Moor macaques, communication, macaque, C800 - Psychology, vocal repertoire
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
