
doi: 10.1002/ajp.22284
pmid: 24710771
The last common ancestor (LCA) shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (P. paniscus) was an Early Pleistocene African ape, which, based on the behavior of modern chimpanzees, may be assumed to be a tool‐using animal. However, the character of tool use in thePanlineage prior to the 20th century is largely unknown. Here, I use available data on wild bonobo tool use and emerging molecular estimates of demography duringPanevolution to hypothesise the plausible tool use behavior of the bonobo‐chimpanzee LCA (or “Pancestor”) at the start of the Pleistocene, over 2 million years ago. This method indicates that the common ancestor of livingPanapes likely used plant tools for probing, sponging, and display, but it did not use stone tools. Instead, stone tool use appears to have been independently invented by Western African chimpanzees (P. t. verus) during the Middle Pleistocene in the region of modern Liberia‐Ivory Coast‐Guinea, possibly as recently as 200,000–150,000 years ago. If this is the case, then the LCA of humans and chimpanzees likely also did not use stone tools, and this trait probably first emerged among hominins in Pliocene East Africa. This review also suggests that the consistently higher population sizes of Central African chimpanzees (P. t. troglodytes) over the past million years may have contributed to the increased complexity of wild tool use seen in this sub‐species today. Am. J. Primatol. 76:910–918, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Evolution, Molecular, Genetics, Population, Pan troglodytes, Tool Use Behavior, Animals, Humans, Hominidae, Pan paniscus
Evolution, Molecular, Genetics, Population, Pan troglodytes, Tool Use Behavior, Animals, Humans, Hominidae, Pan paniscus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
