
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32062
pmid: 18074368
AbstractMandibular prognathism typically shows familial aggregation. Various genetic models have been described and it is assumed to be a multifactorial and polygenic trait, with a threshold for expression. Our goal was to examine specific genetic models of the familial transmission of this trait. The study sample comprised of 2,562 individuals from 55 families. Complete family histories for each proband were ascertained and the affection status of relatives were confirmed by lateral cephalograms, photographs, and dental models. Pedigrees were drawn using PELICAN and complex segregation analysis was performed using POINTER. Parts of some pedigrees were excluded to create one founder pedigrees, so the total N was 2,050. Analysis showed more affected females than males (P = 0.030). The majority of the pedigrees suggest autosomal dominant inheritance. Incomplete penetrance was demonstrated by the ratio of affected/unaffected parents and siblings. The heritability of mandibular prognathism was estimated to be 0.316. We conclude that there is a major gene that influences the expression of mandibular prognathism with clear signs of Mendelian inheritance and a multifactorial component. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Male, Multifactorial Inheritance, Adolescent, Models, Genetic, Cephalometry, Incidence, Penetrance, Middle Aged, Models, Dental, Pedigree, Chromosome Segregation, Prevalence, Prognathism, Chromosomes, Human, Humans, Female, Child, Malocclusion, Genes, Dominant
Adult, Male, Multifactorial Inheritance, Adolescent, Models, Genetic, Cephalometry, Incidence, Penetrance, Middle Aged, Models, Dental, Pedigree, Chromosome Segregation, Prevalence, Prognathism, Chromosomes, Human, Humans, Female, Child, Malocclusion, Genes, Dominant
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 77 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
