
BackgroundThere is limited information on whether the prevalence of exposure to workplace carcinogens varies among shift workers and non‐shift workers.MethodsThis analysis used data from the Australian Work Exposures Study‐Cancer, a telephone survey which examined exposure to carcinogens in the workplace. Workers were classified as shift workers if they indicated that their usual roster ever included work between the hours of midnight and 5 am. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence internals (CIs).ResultsAmong the 5425 workers, 6.88% reported being exposed to shift work. Overall, shift workers were more likely to be exposed to any carcinogen (aPR = 1.16; 95% 1.06‐1.26) and to specific carcinogens such as asbestos (aPR = 1.93; 95% 1.33‐2.83) than non‐shift workers.ConclusionsOur study shows that there are differences in exposure to carcinogenic agents among shift and non‐shift workers, and so there is a need for prevention programs in order to reduce these discrepancies.
Adult, Chromium, Male, Adolescent, Australia, 610, Shift Work Schedule, Asbestos, Dust, Middle Aged, Silicon Dioxide, Lead, Case-Control Studies, Formaldehyde, Occupational Exposure, Radiation, Ionizing, Carcinogens, Humans, Female, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Adult, Chromium, Male, Adolescent, Australia, 610, Shift Work Schedule, Asbestos, Dust, Middle Aged, Silicon Dioxide, Lead, Case-Control Studies, Formaldehyde, Occupational Exposure, Radiation, Ionizing, Carcinogens, Humans, Female, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
