
doi: 10.1002/ajim.1105
pmid: 11598980
AbstractBackgroundDespite the human and monetary costs of occupational injury and illness, occupational health care has focused more on treatment than prevention, and prevention is not part of many clinical occupational health practices. This represents a failure of occupational health care to meet the health care needs of the working patients.MethodsMEDLINE searches were conducted for literature on occupational medical treatment and the prevention of occupational injury and illness were reviewed to for linkages between prevention and treatment. Policy discussions which identify examples of programs that integrated prevention and treatment were included.ResultsAlthough examples of the integration of clinical and preventive occupational health services exist, there are challenges and barriers to such integration. These include inaction by clinicians who do not recognize their potential role in prevention; the absence of a relationship between the clinician and an employer willing to participate in prevention; economic disincentives against prevention; and the absence of tools that evaluate clinicians on their performance in prevention.ConclusionsResearch is needed to improve and promote clinical occupational health preventive services. Am. J. Ind. Med. 40:307–318, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Occupational Diseases, Interprofessional Relations, Managed Care Programs, Preventive Health Services, Occupational Health Services, Humans, Health Services Research, Continuity of Patient Care, United States
Occupational Diseases, Interprofessional Relations, Managed Care Programs, Preventive Health Services, Occupational Health Services, Humans, Health Services Research, Continuity of Patient Care, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
