
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23722
pmid: 35064704
AbstractObjectiveThe previous results from cross‐sectional studies indicate that there could be alterations across time in handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry. One way to investigate this is to test the same children multiple times. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the laterality of HGS in healthy young children at two different time points separated by a year.MethodsA total of 165 preschool children (79 males and 87 females) between the ages of 4.5 and 5.6 years participated and performed maximal voluntary HGS in both hands using a Smedley handgrip dynamometer. We ran a paired sample t‐test on the difference scores (right – left vs. right – left) to determine if HGS (right vs. left) differed across time.ResultsThe difference between hands (t = −4.804, p < .0001) did differ between time points. At the initial test, the mean value of the HGS in the right hand was approximately 15% higher than that of the left hand. This difference between hands was reduced following a year. The mean bias between tests (second test – initial test) and the 95% limits of agreement was −0.84 (−5.27, 3.58) kg.ConclusionContrary to our hypothesis, HGS asymmetry during the initial test (at age 5) was not observed in the second test completed a year later (at age 6). These results suggest that HGS asymmetry is uncertain in children between 5 and 6 years. In this short‐term study, it was impossible to ascertain when HGS asymmetry first appeared. Longer term studies are required to better determine when these changes occur.
Male, Cross-Sectional Studies, Hand Strength, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Child, Hand, Functional Laterality
Male, Cross-Sectional Studies, Hand Strength, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Child, Hand, Functional Laterality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
