Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Journal of Human Biology
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A longitudinal study of handgrip strength asymmetry

Authors: Takashi Abe; Hayao Ozaki; Jeremy P. Loenneke; Toshiharu Natsume; Pengyu Deng; Hisashi Naito;

A longitudinal study of handgrip strength asymmetry

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe previous results from cross‐sectional studies indicate that there could be alterations across time in handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry. One way to investigate this is to test the same children multiple times. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the laterality of HGS in healthy young children at two different time points separated by a year.MethodsA total of 165 preschool children (79 males and 87 females) between the ages of 4.5 and 5.6 years participated and performed maximal voluntary HGS in both hands using a Smedley handgrip dynamometer. We ran a paired sample t‐test on the difference scores (right – left vs. right – left) to determine if HGS (right vs. left) differed across time.ResultsThe difference between hands (t = −4.804, p < .0001) did differ between time points. At the initial test, the mean value of the HGS in the right hand was approximately 15% higher than that of the left hand. This difference between hands was reduced following a year. The mean bias between tests (second test – initial test) and the 95% limits of agreement was −0.84 (−5.27, 3.58) kg.ConclusionContrary to our hypothesis, HGS asymmetry during the initial test (at age 5) was not observed in the second test completed a year later (at age 6). These results suggest that HGS asymmetry is uncertain in children between 5 and 6 years. In this short‐term study, it was impossible to ascertain when HGS asymmetry first appeared. Longer term studies are required to better determine when these changes occur.

Keywords

Male, Cross-Sectional Studies, Hand Strength, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Child, Hand, Functional Laterality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!