
handle: 10054/4261
AbstractThe predictions of the random‐pore model, and various other models formulated here, are compared with experimental data for the uptake of methane by coal. It is found that the most appropriate is a modified model considering coal to be comprised of microporous grains, with the random‐pore model holding for the micropores in the grains. The new model still predicts the same reaction behavior as the random‐pore model.
Environmental Engineering, General Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology
Environmental Engineering, General Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 55 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
