
AbstractBackground and AimPost‐hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) after major hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is a challenge to overcome. However, the appropriate target proportion of the future liver remnant (pFLR) to prevent severe PHLF in major HPD remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the minimum pFLR required for safe major HPD.MethodsThis retrospective study involved 48 major HPD patients. We assessed pFLR and remnant liver function scores (pFLR × albumin‐bilirubin [ALBI] / albumin‐indocyanine green evaluation [ALICE]/plasma clearance rate of indocyanine green [KICG]) as predictors for Grade B/C PHLF and established safety criteria.ResultsGrade B/C PHLF occurred in 40% of the patients (n = 19), leading to severe morbidity and two in‐hospital deaths. pFLR was a good predictor of Grade B/C PHLF [area under the curve (AUC) 0.80, p < 0.01] with a 45% optimal cutoff. While all remnant liver function scores predicted PHLF, the remnant ALICE demonstrated the best predictability (AUC 0.85, p < 0.01), with the sensitivity and specificity at 89% and 83%, respectively, using −0.86 as the cutoff. Independent risk factors for Grade B/C PHLF were remnant ALICE ≥−0.86 and blood loss ≥1500 mL. Grade B/C PHLF developed in 14% with pFLR ≥45% but reached 64% with pFLR <45%. However, the rate could be reduced to 33% with remnant ALICE <−0.86.ConclusionTo prevent Grade B/C PHLF, a pFLR ≥45% is recommended. Nevertheless, major HPD may be considered in patients with good remnant liver function.
RD1-811, biliary cancer, liver failure, hepatopancreatoduodenectomy, Surgery, Original Article, RC799-869, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, liver volume, albumin‐indocyanine green evaluation
RD1-811, biliary cancer, liver failure, hepatopancreatoduodenectomy, Surgery, Original Article, RC799-869, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, liver volume, albumin‐indocyanine green evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
