Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Agronomy Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Agronomy Journal
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Fall grazing improves the performance of Kernza intermediate wheatgrass as a dual‐purpose crop

Authors: Priscila Pinto; Nicole E. Tautges; Jacob M. Jungers; Craig C. Sheaffer; Mitchell Hunter; Valentin D. Picasso;

Fall grazing improves the performance of Kernza intermediate wheatgrass as a dual‐purpose crop

Abstract

Abstract Kernza intermediate wheatgrass (IWG) [ Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey] is a perennial grain and forage crop with novel dual‐use potential. Grazing IWG forage and/or intercropping IWG with legumes can increase total annual forage yields, but the effect of grazing timing on grain yield needs to be understood to maximize producer returns and the productivity of the perennial stand. In this study, we compared Kernza grain and forage yields under different cattle grazing timing treatments (spring, fall, or spring and fall) with ungrazed IWG stands, in both IWG monocultures and IWG–legume intercrops. We established the experiment in the fall of 2016 at Morris, MN, and Lancaster, WI, and collected data over 3 years. In the first grain production year, grazing spring vegetative regrowth reduced Kernza grain yield compared with ungrazed stands in both Minnesota (213 vs. 360 kg ha −1 , respectively) and Wisconsin (821 vs. 1030 kg ha −1 , respectively). However, grazing fall regrowth after summer grain and straw harvest did not negatively affect grain yield in the following year compared to the ungrazed control. Intercropping IWG with legumes increased accumulated forage vegetative regrowth in Wisconsin, but not in Minnesota. Overall, our study confirms IWG's potential as a dual‐purpose crop under grazing management and recommends fall grazing to minimize adverse effects on subsequent grain yields. Future research should focus on refining grazing strategies to maximize dual‐use productivity.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid