
AbstractWe might be at the turning point where research in microfluidics undertaken in academia and industrial research laboratories, and substantially sponsored by public grants, may provide a range of portable and networked diagnostic devices. In this Progress Report, an overview on microfluidic devices that may become the next generation of point‐of‐care (POC) diagnostics is provided. First, we describe gaps and opportunities in medical diagnostics and how microfluidics can address these gaps using the example of immunodiagnostics. Next, we conceptualize how different technologies are converging into working microfluidic POC diagnostics devices. Technologies are explained from the perspective of sample interaction with components of a device. Specifically, we detail materials, surface treatment, sample processing, microfluidic elements (such as valves, pumps, and mixers), receptors, and analytes in the light of various biosensing concepts. Finally, we discuss the integration of components into accurate and reliable devices.
Polymerase-Chain-Reaction, Sequence-Based Amplification, Field-Effect Transistors, Blood Cells, Polymers, Surface Properties, Point-of-Care Systems, Personal Health Records, Dip-Pen Nanolithography, Biosensing Techniques, Immunologic Tests, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Mediated Isothermal Amplification, On-A-Chip, Body Fluids, Self-Assembled Monolayers, In-Vitro Amplification, Humans, Autonomous Capillary Systems
Polymerase-Chain-Reaction, Sequence-Based Amplification, Field-Effect Transistors, Blood Cells, Polymers, Surface Properties, Point-of-Care Systems, Personal Health Records, Dip-Pen Nanolithography, Biosensing Techniques, Immunologic Tests, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Mediated Isothermal Amplification, On-A-Chip, Body Fluids, Self-Assembled Monolayers, In-Vitro Amplification, Humans, Autonomous Capillary Systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 415 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
