
arXiv: 2009.02867
SummaryThe performance of adaptive estimators that employ embedding in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) depends on the choice of the location of basis kernel centers. Parameter convergence and error approximation rates depend on where and how the kernel centers are distributed in the state‐space. In this article, we develop the theory that relates parameter convergence and approximation rates to the position of kernel centers. We develop criteria for choosing kernel centers in a specific class of systems by exploiting the fact that the state trajectory regularly visits the neighborhood of the positive limit set. Two algorithms, based on centroidal Voronoi tessellations and Kohonen self‐organizing maps, are derived to choose kernel centers in the RKHS embedding method. Finally, we implement these methods on two practical examples and test their effectiveness.
Identification in stochastic control theory, adaptive estimation, Kohonen self-organizing maps, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, persistence of excitation, Adaptive control/observation systems, Lloyd's algorithm, Optimization and Control (math.OC), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, FOS: Mathematics, System identification, centroidal Voronoi tessellations, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, Mathematics - Optimization and Control
Identification in stochastic control theory, adaptive estimation, Kohonen self-organizing maps, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, persistence of excitation, Adaptive control/observation systems, Lloyd's algorithm, Optimization and Control (math.OC), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, FOS: Mathematics, System identification, centroidal Voronoi tessellations, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, Mathematics - Optimization and Control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
