
doi: 10.1002/acs.2917
SummaryThis paper solves the finite‐time synchronization and adaptive synchronization problems of drive‐response memristive recurrent neural networks with delays under two control methods. First, the state‐feedback control rule containing delays and the adaptive control rule are designed for realizing synchronization of drive‐response memristive recurrent neural networks in finite time. Then, on the basis of the Lyapunov stability theory, many algebraic sufficient conditions are obtained to guarantee finite‐time synchronization and adaptive synchronization of drive‐response memristive recurrent neural networks via two control methods, which are easily verified. In addition, the estimation of the upper bounds of the settling time of finite‐time synchronization is obtained. Lastly, to illustrate the effectiveness of the obtained theoretical results, two examples are given.
finite-time synchronization, Discrete-time control/observation systems, Adaptive control/observation systems, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, memristive recurrent neural networks, state-feedback control, Lyapunov and other classical stabilities (Lagrange, Poisson, \(L^p, l^p\), etc.) in control theory, Feedback control, Neural networks for/in biological studies, artificial life and related topics, adaptive control
finite-time synchronization, Discrete-time control/observation systems, Adaptive control/observation systems, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, memristive recurrent neural networks, state-feedback control, Lyapunov and other classical stabilities (Lagrange, Poisson, \(L^p, l^p\), etc.) in control theory, Feedback control, Neural networks for/in biological studies, artificial life and related topics, adaptive control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
