
AbstractNearly all aspects of earthquake rupture are controlled by the friction along the fault that progressively increases with tectonic forcing but in general cannot be directly measured. We show that fault friction can be determined at any time, from the continuous seismic signal. In a classic laboratory experiment of repeating earthquakes, we find that the seismic signal follows a specific pattern with respect to fault friction, allowing us to determine the fault's position within its failure cycle. Using machine learning, we show that instantaneous statistical characteristics of the seismic signal are a fingerprint of the fault zone shear stress and frictional state. Further analysis of this fingerprint leads to a simple equation of state quantitatively relating the seismic signal power and the friction on the fault. These results show that fault zone frictional characteristics and the state of stress in the surroundings of the fault can be inferred from seismic waves, at least in the laboratory.
earthquake hazard, Physics - Geophysics, machine learning, QC801-809, seismic signal identification, Geophysics. Cosmic physics, FOS: Physical sciences, laboratory earthquake, fault friction, earthquake hazard; fault friction; laboratory earthquake; machine learning; seismic signal identification, Geophysics (physics.geo-ph)
earthquake hazard, Physics - Geophysics, machine learning, QC801-809, seismic signal identification, Geophysics. Cosmic physics, FOS: Physical sciences, laboratory earthquake, fault friction, earthquake hazard; fault friction; laboratory earthquake; machine learning; seismic signal identification, Geophysics (physics.geo-ph)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
