
arXiv: 1711.09161
handle: 11572/290610
AbstractIn this study, we present a Bayesian hierarchical framework to model fluid‐induced seismicity. The framework is based on a nonhomogeneous Poisson process with a fluid‐induced seismicity rate proportional to the rate of injected fluid. The fluid‐induced seismicity rate model depends upon a set of physically meaningful parameters and has been validated for six fluid‐induced case studies. In line with the vision of hierarchical Bayesian modeling, the rate parameters are considered as random variables. We develop both the Bayesian inference and updating rules, which are used to develop a probabilistic forecasting model. We tested the Basel 2006 fluid‐induced seismic case study to prove that the hierarchical Bayesian model offers a suitable framework to coherently encode both epistemic uncertainty and aleatory variability. Moreover, it provides a robust and consistent short‐term seismic forecasting model suitable for online risk quantification and mitigation.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, epistemic; aleatory, Geophysics, forecast, induced-seismicity, Bayesian analysis, General Earth and Planetary Sciences, Applications (stat.AP), Poisson process, Statistics - Applications, aleatory; Bayesian analysis; epistemic; forecast; induced-seismicity; Poisson process
FOS: Computer and information sciences, epistemic; aleatory, Geophysics, forecast, induced-seismicity, Bayesian analysis, General Earth and Planetary Sciences, Applications (stat.AP), Poisson process, Statistics - Applications, aleatory; Bayesian analysis; epistemic; forecast; induced-seismicity; Poisson process
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
