
doi: 10.1002/2016ef000495
handle: 11588/876347
AbstractIn this study, we demonstrate skillful spring forecasts of detrended September Arctic sea ice extent using passive microwave observations of sea ice concentration (SIC) and melt onset (MO). We compare these to forecasts produced using data from a sophisticated melt pond model, and find similar to higher skill values, where the forecast skill is calculated relative to linear trend persistence. The MO forecasts shows the highest skill in March–May, while the SIC forecasts produce the highest skill in June–August, especially when the forecasts are evaluated over recent years (since 2008). The high MO forecast skill in early spring appears to be driven primarily by the presence and timing of open water anomalies, while the high SIC forecast skill appears to be driven by both open water and surface melt processes. Spatial maps of detrended anomalies highlight the drivers of the different forecasts, and enable us to understand regions of predictive importance. Correctly capturing sea ice state anomalies, along with changes in open water coverage appear to be key processes in skillfully forecasting summer Arctic sea ice.
Science & Technology, Multidisciplinary, Arctic; prediction; sea ice, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, Geology, prediction, sea ice, Minimum Extent, Arctic, Physical Sciences, Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Environmental Sciences, Geosciences
Science & Technology, Multidisciplinary, Arctic; prediction; sea ice, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, Geology, prediction, sea ice, Minimum Extent, Arctic, Physical Sciences, Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Environmental Sciences, Geosciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 47 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
