Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Cochrane Database of...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1002/146518...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1998 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Abdominal decompression in normal pregnancy

Authors: G Justus, Hofmeyr; Regina, Kulier;

Abdominal decompression in normal pregnancy

Abstract

Abdominal decompression was developed as a means of pain relief during labour. It has also been used for complications of pregnancy, and in healthy pregnant women in an attempt to improve fetal wellbeing and intellectual development.The objective of this review was to assess the effects of prophylactic abdominal decompression on admission for pre-eclampsia, fetal growth, perinatal morbidity and mortality and childhood development.The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: February 1999.Randomised trials comparing abdominal decompression with dummy decompression or no treatment in healthy pregnant women.Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by one reviewer.Three studies were included. There was no difference between the abdominal decompression groups and the control groups for low birth weight (relative risk 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 1.77) and perinatal mortality (relative risk 2.47, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 7.92). There were no differences in admission for pre-eclampsia, Apgar score and childhood development.There is no evidence to support the use of abdominal decompression in normal pregnancies. Future research should be directed towards the use of abdominal decompression during labour, and during complicated pregnancies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Lower Body Negative Pressure, Pregnancy Complications, Child Development, Patient Dropouts, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
bronze
Related to Research communities