Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Harm in Looking

Authors: Alan R. Schroeder; Rita F. Redberg;

The Harm in Looking

Abstract

Asaresultof therecentgrowthinthefieldofdiagnostic imaging, the US population has been subjected to a 7-fold increase in exposure tomedical radiation since the 1980s.1 Concerns over radiation-induced malignancy continue to mount in the popular2,3 and scientific4-7 press. In this issue of JAMA Pediatrics, Miglioretti et al8 provide valuable data on the use of computed tomography (CT) in pediatrics and the associated radiationexposure in childrenduring the period from 1996 to 2010; the data were derived from a large research network of health maintenance organizations in the United States. The authors used a random sample of CT scans to calculate radiation dosages and to estimate attributable risks of malignancy. In a similar investigationof adults, they found that, in 2010, an average of just over 1 diagnostic imaging test involving radiation was performed perenrollee, for anaverage radiationexposureof 2.34mSv (the equivalentofover200posterior-anterior chest radiographs).6,9 Using the same database, Miglioretti et al8 present several noteworthy findings: (1) the overall use of CT in pediatrics increased 2to 3-fold during this timeperiod, (2) substantial variability existed in the radiation doses used, and (3) projections of the risks of malignancy with the use of certain scans are higher than previously reported (eg, 1 in 300 girls younger than 5 years of age who undergo an abdominal/ pelvis CT scan will develop a subsequent solid tumor).

Keywords

Male, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Humans, Female, Radiation Dosage, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!