
pmid: 23752680
Gallstonedisease causes a substantialhealthandeconomicburden in theUnited States andother developed countries.More than 6millionmen and 14millionwomen aged 20 to 74 years in the United States have gallbladder disease.1 Approximately 650 000 to 700 000 cholecystectomies are performed annually in the United States, and the costs associated with the symptoms and complications of gallstones are estimated to be $6.5 billion per year.2 Known risk factors for gallbladder disease includeobesity, recentweight loss, age, hormoneuse, parity, lack of exercise, and alcohol use. We found the article by Stender et al interesting clinically andmethodologically.First, usingobservationaldataandmultivariable analysis to adjust for a variety of known risk factors for gallbladder disease, the authors demonstrate that an elevated plasma bilirubin level is associatedwith a greater likelihood of symptomatic gallbladder disease. Second, using a technique referred to as mendelian randomization, the authors took advantage of the random assortment of genes that occurs during gamete formation. Theydemonstrate that a genetic variant that is associated with increased plasma bilirubin levels is associatedwith an increased likelihood of symptomatic gallstone disease. Because the exposure (the genetic variant) is random, the genetic analysis increases the likelihoodthat the relationshipbetweenplasmabilirubinandsymptomatic gallstone disease is causal. As the human genome is increasingly defined, it is likely that mendelian randomization can become a valuable tool to help confirm or refute whether relationships between other risk factors and diseases are causal.
Male, Humans, Bilirubin, Female, Gallstones, Glucuronosyltransferase, Antioxidants
Male, Humans, Bilirubin, Female, Gallstones, Glucuronosyltransferase, Antioxidants
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
