<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Annual health care expenditures currently exceed $2.5 trillion in the United States, a cost burden equivalent to more than $8000 per person per year. Treatment strategies designed to optimize efficacy, ie, avoiding therapeutic failure while minimizing toxicity, hold the potential to reduce this cost burden. For many drugs, variability in outcome is influenced by 1 or more genetic factors. Because many of these genetic factors have only recently been challenged with modern pharmaceuticals, variants of strong clinical relevance are often found at fairly high frequency within the general population. Individualized drug therapy is especially desirable when the therapeutic index is narrow and the consequences of drug toxicity are life-threatening (eg, antineoplastics, anticoagulants, immune modulators). Many such drugs are administered at maximally tolerated doses. Because these doses are often chosen from population averages, as many as one-third of patients exposed may develop unacceptable toxicity, and a significant proportion of patients will not respond. This increases the risk-benefit ratio for individual patients and imposes a sizeable economic strain on the health care system. An important unanswered question is whether genetics will solve this problem or add further cost to health care with relatively little benefit on outcome.
Polymorphism, Genetic, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Pharmacogenetics, Electronic Health Records, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Precision Medicine
Polymorphism, Genetic, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Pharmacogenetics, Electronic Health Records, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Precision Medicine
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 53 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |