descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 14 Apr 2010 English Publisher:American Medical Association (AMA)Journal:JAMA, volume 303, page 1,368 (issn: 0098-7484,

Authors: A. Cecile J.W. Janssens; Bob J. H. van Kempen; Bart S. Ferket;

doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.389 , 10.1001/jama.2010.388

Assessing Predictive Performance Beyond the Framingham Risk Score

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

_To the Editor:_ According to the review by Dr Tzoulaki and colleagues, most studies that claimed improved predictive performance beyond the Framingham risk score (FRS) had flaws in their design, analyses, and reporting. To interpret these observations, 2 questions are pertinent: what did the original studies aim to investigate, and what constitutes a claim? [...]

Related Organizations

Erasmus University Rotterdam
Netherlands

Keywords

EMC NIHES-01-64-03, EMC NIHES-03-30-02

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	6
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average