
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 3079843
To the Editor.— Rock et al 1 reported that in studies in 1982, the stated content of ampules of lyophilized antihemophilic factor (AHF, factor VIII) concentrates often exceeded the measured content, as assayed in the authors' laboratory. They stated that this discrepancy, with its implications of systematic undertreatment of classic hemophilia, has been corrected, an opinion shared by Lusher. 2 In our own experience, this is overoptimistic. The titers of coagulant AHF (factor VIII:C) in two ampules of the same lot of a commercial concentrate were 60% and 62% of that listed on the label. The ampules' expiration date was March 11, 1987, suggesting that this was a recent lot. I obtained the same result in an inadvertent blind study of our AHF assay in 1983, in which the local Red Cross and my laboratory assayed the same samples. My values averaged 58% of theirs ( P
Solutions, Factor VIII, Freeze Drying, Reference Standards
Solutions, Factor VIII, Freeze Drying, Reference Standards
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
