
The idea behind this book is appealing, high-minded, and symbolically attractive—to bring together the work of 21 medical scientists from all over the world who share the convictions that global health is both critically important and critically imperiled and that governments and physicians must quickly learn to transcend geographic and political boundaries or risk losing their patient—the planet. The execution of the idea, unfortunately, falls short of the mark. The book seems somewhat arbitrarily subdivided, for example, and one frequently wonders what contiguous contributions have in common either with each other or with their section heading. A section on ethical issues (eg, research with children and animals and the artificial heart) adds little and seems discordant with the avowed global thrust of the book. Similarly, many of the chapters are overly focused on issues relevant only to the developed nations, while the crisis—as so eloquently described by other authors—lies with
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
