Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
JAMAarrow_drop_down
JAMA
Article . 1985 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
JAMA
Article . 1987 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
JAMA
Article . 1982 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
JAMA
Article . 1986 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
JAMA
Article . 1988
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Authors: Edward C. Hill;

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Heightened public interest in medical progress has brought the news media into an ever increasing role in the dissemination of new information. Frequently, the television, radio, or newspaper is the first source of such information, long before it appears in the medical journals, where a careful, dispassionate presentation of the facts can be made and subjected to peer review and criticism. Two developments in obstetrics and gynecology received wide publicity in 1981, exciting the imagination of the medical profession and the lay public. These were the birth of the first baby in the United States to result from in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, and the successful in utero placement of an indwelling suprapubic bladder catheter into a male fetus with urethral obstruction, allowing further in utero development. Both of these events were the result of tremendous strides in several disciplines and the amalgamation of their findings. Both occurred because

Keywords

Gestational Carriers, Adolescent, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Abortion, Induced, Fertilization in Vitro, Bioethics, Embryo Transfer, Embryo, Mammalian, Organizational Policy, Contraception, Human Experimentation, Physicians, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female, Bioethical Issues, Societies, Health Education, Sexuality, Insemination, Artificial

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?