Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
JAMAarrow_drop_down
JAMA
Article . 1982 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
JAMA
Article . 1982
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Actinomyces and Intrauterine Devices

Authors: Helen L. D. Duguid; I. D. Duncan; Robert Traynor; David Parratt;

Actinomyces and Intrauterine Devices

Abstract

To the Editor.— It was with interest that we read the recent editorial on Actinomyces in vaginal smears (1982; 247:1175), suggesting that women who had Actinomyces -positive smears should use a contraceptive method other than the intrauterine device (IUD). This report was publicized in the British lay press. We have examined cervical material from 197 plastic-device users and 209 copper-device users, and have found 1,2 a significant difference in the prevalence of actinomycete infestation between the two groups (42% and 2%, respectively). In every case, the type of device and duration of use were noted, the comparison being almost exclusively between Saf-T-Coil and Gravigard. In the first retrospective study, actinomycetes were identified by morphological characteristics in direct cervical smears. In the second prospective study, they were identified on culture supported by specific immunofluorescence, positive results being obtained in 37 of 75 IUD users tested. Using our previously reported culture technique

Keywords

Actinomycetales, Uterus, Humans, Female, Intrauterine Devices, Copper, Actinomycetales Infections, Intrauterine Devices

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!