
pmid: 7109179
To the Editor.— It was with interest that we read the recent editorial on Actinomyces in vaginal smears (1982; 247:1175), suggesting that women who had Actinomyces -positive smears should use a contraceptive method other than the intrauterine device (IUD). This report was publicized in the British lay press. We have examined cervical material from 197 plastic-device users and 209 copper-device users, and have found 1,2 a significant difference in the prevalence of actinomycete infestation between the two groups (42% and 2%, respectively). In every case, the type of device and duration of use were noted, the comparison being almost exclusively between Saf-T-Coil and Gravigard. In the first retrospective study, actinomycetes were identified by morphological characteristics in direct cervical smears. In the second prospective study, they were identified on culture supported by specific immunofluorescence, positive results being obtained in 37 of 75 IUD users tested. Using our previously reported culture technique
Actinomycetales, Uterus, Humans, Female, Intrauterine Devices, Copper, Actinomycetales Infections, Intrauterine Devices
Actinomycetales, Uterus, Humans, Female, Intrauterine Devices, Copper, Actinomycetales Infections, Intrauterine Devices
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
