Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
JAMAarrow_drop_down
JAMA
Article . 1973 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
JAMA
Article . 1973
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Double-Blind Studies of Acupuncture

Authors: Lester C. Mark;

Double-Blind Studies of Acupuncture

Abstract

To the Editor.— Chein and Shapiro (224:1533, 1973) accept with reservations my objection (223:922, 1973) that double-blind studies of acupuncture are not feasible. (The reason is that correct placement of acupuncture needles requires cooperation of the patient in reporting paresthesias, a sensation of soreness, or mild discomfort, and, hence, renders useless efforts to deceive him with placebo needles deliberately inserted elsewhere.) They agree that this may be so with manually manipulated needles but claim that electric acupuncture stimulators can mimic the symptoms described, thereby validating the double-blind approach with placebo stimulation at sites other than acupuncture points. In support of their claim, Chein and Shapiro offer two references, both eye-witness reports by physician visitors to the People's Republic of China. However, the first citation by Dimond (218:1558, 1971) states "We asked how the anesthetist knew if he had placed the needles at the right point and depth. He said [and this

Keywords

Evaluation Studies as Topic, Needles, Acupuncture Therapy, Humans, Electric Stimulation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?