
pmid: 5694090
To the Editor:— Your subscribers should not be left supposing that the review of John J. Bonica's Principles and Practice of Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia ( 202 :249, 1967) represents, by any chance, the opinions of physicians actually giving obstetric anesthesia. This work is a scholarly, comprehensive, and up-to-date presentation of current principles and available techniques; it should serve for years as a reference for anesthesiologists and obstetricians seriously interested in pain relief for the mother. Admittedly, it does not offer a "cookbook" presentation of how to manage each situation, and one must agree with the reviewer that in the 15 or 20 minutes before a complicated vaginal delivery or an emergency cesarian section, it would probably be of little practical value. The inference is frightening, namely, that a handbook for this type of obstetric anesthesia personnel would be valuable rather than hazardous. The review should be evaluated in the perspective
Adult, Pregnancy, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female, Analgesia
Adult, Pregnancy, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female, Analgesia
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
