Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
JAMAarrow_drop_down
JAMA
Article . 1965 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
JAMA
Article . 1966
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Regional Anesthesia by the Intravenous Route

Authors: E M Slater; H M Bell; W H Harris;

Regional Anesthesia by the Intravenous Route

Abstract

Experience using three local anesthetic agents (lidocaine hydrochloride, chloroprocaine hydrochloride, and prilocaine) intravenously in producing regional anesthesia in extremities isolated from the systemic circulation by a tourniquet is compared. Chloroprocaine produced thrombophlebitis in 4 of 51 patients. Although prilocaine produced excellent anesthesia, its use should be reserved for clinical trials until further data are available concerning the production of methemoglobinemia. Taking both effectiveness and safety into account, lidocaine appears to be the drug of choice at this time. In our experience, and from the reports in the literature, 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine hydrochloride is preferable to 3 mg/kg. This dose resulted in good or excellent regional anesthesia in 60 of 66 patients when injected after a 20-minute period of ischemia had been effected by the use of an arterial tourniquet.

Keywords

Male, Arm Injuries, Fractures, Bone, Anesthesia, Conduction, Anesthesia, Intravenous, Humans, Lidocaine, Female, Anesthetics, Local, Methemoglobinemia, Leg Injuries

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    33
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
33
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?