
To the Editor: —Upon review of the six cases reported by Dr. O'Loughlin's group, 1 which incidentally appear to be identical to ours, I was surprised to find that only one of their six patients underwent biopsy, and the findings from this biopsy proved to be negative. Dr. O'Loughlin's statement that "no bacteriological or viral etiologic agents could be identified" does not, therefore, seem to be too surprising, at least to those investigators who appreciate the value of direct biopsy of a suspected infectious lesion to obtain material for bacteriologic culture and sensitivity studies. In commenting on Sherbel and Gardner's series, Dr. O'Loughlin et al state: "Vigorous diagnostic effort led to proof of infection either by aspiration or curettement of the intervertebral disk in 7 of the 10 cases with positive culture in each of these." To suggest, therefore, that our consecutive positive cultures for Staphylococcus aureus , obtained from five
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
