
ABSTRACT To the Editor:— In regard to the answer of Dr. J. H. Lewis to the question "Blood in Feces" (JAMA178:534 [Nov. 4] 1961), I would like to make 2 statements. One concerns the sensitivity of the benzidine test: A long time has elapsed since O. and R. Adler's original article and the Schlesinger-Holst modification about using benzidine to determine occult blood in the stool. The very sensitive method was modified in 1919 by J. P. Gregersen to reduce its sensitivity. Today, methods of reduced sensitivity using benzidine di-hydrochloride exist. I have found equal sensitivity between this improved benzidine di-hydrochloride and the guaiac methods. Meat-free diet is not a "must" with the benzidine method mentioned. The second statement concerns the so-called better "specificity" of guaiac. I do not know in what way this word is used. If used literally, it would be the same as stating that the V.D.R.L.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
