
To the Editor:— An article entitled "Simple Removal of Ocular Foreign Bodies," on page 119 of the Jan. 12, 1952, issue ofThe Journalstates that a BB shot was in the center of the vitreous and "that with pressure applied over the most posterior aspects of the visible sclera the BB popped out of the eyeball with a yellow gelatinous material that took the form of a long tail." Any competent ophthalmologist will quickly recognize this as conjunctival secretion. The foreign body never was inside of the globe but only in the conjunctival sac, and when the lids were opened the shot fell out. The report is clinically misleading and may be also dangerous, for it recommends a method of treatment fraught with grave risks. The reporter failed to find any opening in the globe before or even after his manual expression. This is sufficient to cast a deep
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
