Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Amsterdam, N. Y., Sept. 20, 1897. To the Editor: —The remarks of Dr. E. P. Stimson in the last number of theJournalupon some statements of mine at the Niagara Falls meeting of the American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, when the subject of eclampsia was under discussion, claim some recognition. My point was that the elaboration of Haine's modification of Haser's method for the determination of thetotal urinary solidsby Dr. Etheridge of Chicago was a very valuable means of detecting renal inadequacy. I placed this in contrast to the Doremus test fortotal amount of urea. The reporter failed to fix the difference, and the figures were therefore senseless. To those who are unfamiliar with this method of estimating the total urinary solids, references may be found in the Transactions of the Medical Society of New York, for 1896; Gould's Year-Book, for 1897;Chicago Medical Recorder
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts