
pmid: 3800645
To the Editor .—Johnson et al 1 determined the percentages of race and sex distribution found in a series of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) detected among a group of patients who had autopsies or computed tomographic (CT) scans at a North Carolina hospital. They reported the "incidence" by race of AAA by projecting this distribution to the state population. We object to the use of the term incidence , which is generally defined as the number of new cases that occur in a population over a specified time period. The authors were attempting to determine prevalence . We are concerned about selection bias and the representativeness of the study group with respect to the general population of people with AAA. People who undergo autopsy or CT scan are not representative of all blacks and whites in North Carolina unless systematic postmortem examinations or CT scans are performed in this population. 2 Many
Black or African American, North Carolina, Black People, Humans, Aorta, Abdominal, Aortic Aneurysm
Black or African American, North Carolina, Black People, Humans, Aorta, Abdominal, Aortic Aneurysm
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
