
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script> Copyright policy )
 Copyright policy )pmid: 15414112
THE MANAGEMENT of patients with gross bleeding 1 from the upper gastrointestinal tract has become a subject of renewed interest. It is difficult to obtain facts from the literature on this subject, because such hemorrhage can be of all degrees of severity and can occur from a variety of lesions and in various manners. Comparison of reports from different authors is therefore difficult. Yet it is obvious that a change is taking place among the members of the medical profession in their view of how these patients should be managed. There is also an encouraging trend of improvement in results. SOURCE OF BLEEDING Costello 2 reported on 300 patients who vomited gross blood and had evidence of shock or anemia or both. Of these, 69.3 per cent bled from peptic ulcer, an additional 18 per cent from acute or chronic gastritis and 1.3 per cent from gastric carcinoma, a total
Peptic Ulcer, Humans, Hemorrhage
Peptic Ulcer, Humans, Hemorrhage
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | 
