<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 3365344
To the Editor.—In the article that appeared in the December issue of theArchives, by Lindeman et al,1they concluded that acute traumatic tympanic membrane perforations do not need to be treated routinely with paper patching. I am convinced that their observation regarding the healing rate, whether or not a paper patch was used, is valid. However, the majority of the patients that I see with acute traumatic tympanic membrane perforations are symptomatic, and their prime complaints are decreased hearing, tinnitus, and otalgia. The vast majority of the patients that I patch obtain almost immediate relief of symptoms. Although I admit that I had the feeling that they healed quicker and more frequently with the paper patch, I also was seeking to achieve relief of their symptoms through the paper patching. I would suggest that this is a very valid reason for patching most traumatic perforations of
Tympanic Membrane, Humans, Wounds, Penetrating
Tympanic Membrane, Humans, Wounds, Penetrating
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |