Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Rubella and Deafness

Authors: G, Kelemen;

Rubella and Deafness

Abstract

HEARING defect in the progeny of mothers who suffered rubella in the first trimester of pregnancy is a well-studied phenomenon. To put on a histopathological basis the multitude of clinical observations, two groups of material are available. Elective hysterotomy, upon indication of maternal rubella, yields temporal bones; another group is formed by newborn, older children, or adults with rubella in the maternal history. Both groups offer advantages and disadvantages. Interruption material guarantees correct diagnosis in the mother, removal in the critical period, immediate fixation of the specimen. Material from the newborn may exhibit postrubella malformations, and that from older children or adults possibly is accompanied by audiometric findings. Lancaster 1 traced back the postmortem evidence of the possible role of rubella in deafness, his tabulation comprising the years between 1895 and 1945. Up to 1953, ten pertinent reports could be collected from the literature. In 1959 it could be reported

Keywords

Adult, Heart Defects, Congenital, Male, Infant, Newborn, Ear, Middle, Infant, Temporal Bone, Ear, Deafness, In Vitro Techniques, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Polyps, Pregnancy, Tetralogy of Fallot, Humans, Female, Otitis, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Rubella, Ear Ossicles

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!