
pmid: 5937792
HEARING defect in the progeny of mothers who suffered rubella in the first trimester of pregnancy is a well-studied phenomenon. To put on a histopathological basis the multitude of clinical observations, two groups of material are available. Elective hysterotomy, upon indication of maternal rubella, yields temporal bones; another group is formed by newborn, older children, or adults with rubella in the maternal history. Both groups offer advantages and disadvantages. Interruption material guarantees correct diagnosis in the mother, removal in the critical period, immediate fixation of the specimen. Material from the newborn may exhibit postrubella malformations, and that from older children or adults possibly is accompanied by audiometric findings. Lancaster 1 traced back the postmortem evidence of the possible role of rubella in deafness, his tabulation comprising the years between 1895 and 1945. Up to 1953, ten pertinent reports could be collected from the literature. In 1959 it could be reported
Adult, Heart Defects, Congenital, Male, Infant, Newborn, Ear, Middle, Infant, Temporal Bone, Ear, Deafness, In Vitro Techniques, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Polyps, Pregnancy, Tetralogy of Fallot, Humans, Female, Otitis, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Rubella, Ear Ossicles
Adult, Heart Defects, Congenital, Male, Infant, Newborn, Ear, Middle, Infant, Temporal Bone, Ear, Deafness, In Vitro Techniques, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Polyps, Pregnancy, Tetralogy of Fallot, Humans, Female, Otitis, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Rubella, Ear Ossicles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
