
In no field of otology is there so much confusion as in the treatment of neoplasms of the middle ear. The general attitude has been that radical mastoidectomy should be performed but that the outlook is hopeless and the patient doomed. The literature is scanty. The older literature refers to malignant growths of the middle ear as medical curiosities. Newhart 1 stated that he found reports of only 8 cases in the American literature. Keeler 2 in 1922 thoroughly reviewed the literature and compiled 60 instances and added 2 of his own. Since 1922, Barnes, 3 Furstenberg, 4 Lewis, 5 Burton 6 and Fraser 7 have presented reports of cases. INCIDENCE In the past twelve years 15 patients with neoplasms involving the middle ear were seen by the otologic staff of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Three of these patients are now living—two, four and nine years, respectively,
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 59 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
