Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Management of Traumatic Hemorrhagic Retinal Detachment With Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Authors: William F. Mieler; Gary W. Abrams; Dennis P. Han; Daniel M. Schwartz;

Management of Traumatic Hemorrhagic Retinal Detachment With Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Abstract

Traumatic hemorrhagic retinal detachment may prevent successful visual rehabilitation of eyes with severe posterior segment injury. We managed 19 consecutive cases of traumatic hemorrhagic retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckling, and fluid-gas exchange, with or without internal drainage of subretinal hemorrhage. We based our approach on the amount of subretinal hemorrhage present and the location of associated retinal breaks. Internal drainage of subretinal hemorrhage was performed in 16 eyes to allow adequate retinopexy to hemorrhagically elevated retinal breaks (9 eyes), to remove massive subretinal hemorrhage (4 eyes), and to allow intraoperative reattachment when the retina exhibited bullous retinal detachment (3 eyes). Overall, with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, anatomic reattachment was achieved in 13 (68%) of 19 eyes, and functional success (visual acuity 5/200 or better) was achieved in 6 (32%) of 19 eyes. Anatomic failure resulted from proliferative vitreoretinopathy (4 eyes) and globe atrophy (2 eyes). Drainage of subretinal blood appeared to be beneficial for hemorrhagically elevated retinal tears to allow adequate retinopexy and may help to accomplish long-term anatomic attachment in eyes with massive subretinal hemorrhage or bullous retinal detachment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Fundus Oculi, Retinal Detachment, Retinal Hemorrhage, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Eye Injuries, Penetrating, Eye Foreign Bodies, Child, Preschool, Vitrectomy, Drainage, Humans, Female, Child, Follow-Up Studies, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!