<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 7236095
To the Editor. —The article by Edwards et al entitled "Loxoscelism of the Eyelids" in the NovemberArchives(1980;98:1997-2000) has the following flaws, in my opinion. I do not believe the author can demonstrate that this necrosis of the eyelids was due to loxoscelism at all. The spider was not recovered to be identified by an expert, nor were findings from specific immunologic studies presented. The editors of the principal scientific journal concerned with studies of venoms, Toxicon, have repeatedly protested the publication of cases of envenomation of humans in which no evidence of the source of the venom can be given. Considering only cases of proved loxoscelism, no similar pattern of spread of venom away from the site of the bite is known. In the human dermis, the venom is rapidly fixed to blood vessels, and so, almost always, necrosis at the original site is rapid and
Spider Bites, Eyelids, Humans
Spider Bites, Eyelids, Humans
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |